It is currently Wed Apr 17, 2024 11:47 pm

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]

Recent News:



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 2:10 am 
Offline
2.5TB storage
2.5TB storage

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:07 pm
Posts: 255
Thanks: 4
Thanked: 4 times in 4 posts
How are people integrating an extra layer of redundancy using RAID in WHS?

Can you have each set of 5 drives be a RAID-5 array and then 15 disks becomes 3 RAID arrays and then WHS duplicates data using those 3 arrays? That's what I'm thinking of. Maybe starting with 2 RAID-5 arrays at first of 5 drives each. I'd imagine with the right controller all this would be transparent to the WHS system that sees each array as a drive. For system drive 2 64GB SSDs in RAID 1 sounds like a plan. But will the new WHS install on a 64GB drive? Now that it does not use the system drive for a landing space I cannot see a good reason why it needs a minimum space on the system drive. If anything 2 X25-E 32GB in Raid 1 sounds hot. I'll let the data stay on other drives. I think that's a better overall design. Even the next MSS should use an SSD for system drive maybe not as fancy as the Intel drive but something decent enough.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  

Attention Guest: Remove this ad by Registering with the MediaSmartServer.net Forums. It's Free!
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:28 am 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:54 am
Posts: 10735
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Thanks: 630
Thanked: 931 times in 885 posts
I don't know of people using RAID with WHS except in testing scenarios, and personally don't see a compelling reason to do it. I will caution that if you do this, make sure to use a good hardware RAID controller and not software RAID.

_________________
Alex Kuretz
Remote Notification: Monitoring and alerting for your Home Server via email, Twitter, text message, RSS, push notifications, and on your Mac desktop
Have you tried our Add-Ins?


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
sxr71 wrote:
How are people integrating an extra layer of redundancy using RAID in WHS?

Can you have each set of 5 drives be a RAID-5 array and then 15 disks becomes 3 RAID arrays and then WHS duplicates data using those 3 arrays? That's what I'm thinking of. Maybe starting with 2 RAID-5 arrays at first of 5 drives each. I'd imagine with the right controller all this would be transparent to the WHS system that sees each array as a drive. For system drive 2 64GB SSDs in RAID 1 sounds like a plan. But will the new WHS install on a 64GB drive? Now that it does not use the system drive for a landing space I cannot see a good reason why it needs a minimum space on the system drive. If anything 2 X25-E 32GB in Raid 1 sounds hot. I'll let the data stay on other drives. I think that's a better overall design. Even the next MSS should use an SSD for system drive maybe not as fancy as the Intel drive but something decent enough.


If you want to use Raid 5 do so but don't add it to the data pool just share it out directly. Expanding an array in the pool will cause issues. Finally, a drive is allowed to be 2TB max when added to the pool, do you really want to limit your Raid 5 array to 2TB?


Last edited by Jeff Flowerday on Wed May 20, 2009 3:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:51 pm 
Offline
MVP/Moderator
MVP/Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 8:21 am
Posts: 4725
Location: Dutchess County, NY
Thanks: 77
Thanked: 273 times in 268 posts
I have actually seen a DIY system that used a RAID-1 (Mirror) array for the System Drive (2x320GB). A very nice insurance against a failure of the System Drive. As Alex suggests above, this was a HARDWARE RAID. (No, I do not recall the implementation details; too long ago.)

The same individual initially planned to use RAID-5 for the other drives to be added to the storage pool but realized that an array of 5x1.5TB would be problematic (again, see above) as well as not cost-effective when compared to just using WHS DE duplication. (It actually worked fine initially in a 5x500GB array that was replaced after a month of use.) He was additionally concerned that he would force himself into a dependency on the RAID-5 controller should he later wish to migrate to new hardware and, hopefully, move the disks intact. I pointed out that he was also introducing another layer of abstraction (RAID hardware) along with the potential for additional failures that may be encountered.

Last I heard the System Drive is still 2x320GB RAID-1 and the remaining drives (8) are all individual 1.5TB units. I suspect he has added additional drives by now though! If I ever do a DIY WHS it will be similarly configured. (And I do expect to build such a test system soon, but I do NOT plan to replace my MSS!)

_________________
....JBick

EX475, 2 GB, LE-1640
PC1: Vista-->W7 Ultimate/32, (D-Drive RAID-5 Array)
PC2: Lenovo Laptop, Win XP Home SP3
2xLinksys WRT54G v1.1 and 2xNetGear GS105 Gbit switch


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 3:50 pm 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
I'm running a Raid 1 on my system drive. Just that little extra peace of mind.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 4:31 pm 
Offline
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Posts: 902
Location: Florida
Thanks: 53
Thanked: 35 times in 35 posts
Jeff Flowerday wrote:
I'm running a Raid 1 on my system drive. Just that little extra peace of mind.


Jeff, would you mind sharing a few more details on you system drive setup? I might move a little quicker to a DIY solution than I had planned if I could address my concerns over a system drive failure. I think I have good backup options addressed for all failures pretty well now except for that. I don’t want to have to worry about reinstalling the utilities, add-ins and other programs (and the configuration of same) that I have running on the server sys drive if that drive fails. I am guessing your setup would protect me from this kind of failure? Could you tell us a little about your setup, controller card, matched sys disk drive, etc.?
George

_________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle - Greek critic, philosopher, physicist, & zoologist (384 BC - 322 BC)


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 7:18 pm 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
SeaRay33 wrote:
Jeff Flowerday wrote:
I'm running a Raid 1 on my system drive. Just that little extra peace of mind.


Jeff, would you mind sharing a few more details on you system drive setup? I might move a little quicker to a DIY solution than I had planned if I could address my concerns over a system drive failure. I think I have good backup options addressed for all failures pretty well now except for that. I don’t want to have to worry about reinstalling the utilities, add-ins and other programs (and the configuration of same) that I have running on the server sys drive if that drive fails. I am guessing your setup would protect me from this kind of failure? Could you tell us a little about your setup, controller card, matched sys disk drive, etc.?
George



I have the onboard Intel Matrix Raid on my motherboard. I actually enabled the Raid mode after the fact by moving my system drive to a second controller, making it boot from there and enabling Intel Raid mode in the bios in one shot. I booted into Safe mode and installed the drivers. Move the system drive back to the intel controller put a second drive on the controller and told it to do a Raid 1 with the current system drive as the source preserving the data.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
The following user would like to thank Jeff Flowerday for this post
SeaRay33
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:14 pm 
Offline
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Posts: 902
Location: Florida
Thanks: 53
Thanked: 35 times in 35 posts
Jeff Flowerday wrote:
SeaRay33 wrote:
Jeff, would you mind sharing a few more details on you system drive setup? I might move a little quicker to a DIY solution than I had planned if I could address my concerns over a system drive failure. I think I have good backup options addressed for all failures pretty well now except for that. I don’t want to have to worry about reinstalling the utilities, add-ins and other programs (and the configuration of same) that I have running on the server sys drive if that drive fails. I am guessing your setup would protect me from this kind of failure? Could you tell us a little about your setup, controller card, matched sys disk drive, etc.?
George



I have the onboard Intel Matrix Raid on my motherboard. I actually enabled the Raid mode after the fact by moving my system drive to a second controller, making it boot from there and enabling Intel Raid mode in the bios in one shot. I booted into Safe mode and installed the drivers. Move the system drive back to the intel controller put a second drive on the controller and told it to do a Raid 1 with the current system drive as the source preserving the data.


Thanks for your detailed answer, Jeff. I appreciate it. Two follow-up questions; so is your solution a hardware or a software RAID solution? Do you need to make sure the two dirves you are using for RAID 1 are a matched pair of dirves, maybe even to the point that the s/n on the two drives you use of the system drive are sequential numbers?

Thanks. That will be all of my questions :D
George

_________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle - Greek critic, philosopher, physicist, & zoologist (384 BC - 322 BC)


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 8:40 pm 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2007 11:54 am
Posts: 10735
Location: Fort Collins, Colorado
Thanks: 630
Thanked: 931 times in 885 posts
Be aware, not everything that claims to be hardware RAID is really hardware RAID, and WHS can have issues running on Software RAID.

_________________
Alex Kuretz
Remote Notification: Monitoring and alerting for your Home Server via email, Twitter, text message, RSS, push notifications, and on your Mac desktop
Have you tried our Add-Ins?


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:28 pm 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
Intel Matrix ICH10 is actually classes a firmware raid. It's part of the southbridge on your motherboard. The difference between it and a dedicated hardware raid solution is the intel matrix solution will use a small amount of CPU power to do the disk management work, where a dedicated card will actually have it's own processor doing the work.

It's not a software raid solution and it no way tied to the OS, nor is the OS involved in disk management when it comes to the array(s).


Last edited by Jeff Flowerday on Wed May 20, 2009 10:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:33 pm 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
George:

To answer your second question it's always safer and smart to match your drives by model number. You don't need to go so crazy as trying to find sequential drives by serial number.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 12:05 am 
Offline
2.5TB storage
2.5TB storage

Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 12:07 pm
Posts: 255
Thanks: 4
Thanked: 4 times in 4 posts
yakuza wrote:
Be aware, not everything that claims to be hardware RAID is really hardware RAID, and WHS can have issues running on Software RAID.


If I ever did it I would go whole hog and get: http://www.areca.us/products/pcietosas1680series.htm

That one controller could handle my theoretical RAID5 arrays and system RAID1 array.

However I didn't know about the 2TB limit for drives. Why? Is it a 32-bit thing? What would happen when 3TB drives arrive on the market?


If I'm doing system drive as RAID1 only I would consider the Intel solution from what I read above.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 8:08 am 
Offline
2.0TB storage
2.0TB storage

Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:53 am
Posts: 115
Location: Calgary,AB
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
sxr71 wrote:
However I didn't know about the 2TB limit for drives. Why? Is it a 32-bit thing? What would happen when 3TB drives arrive on the market?


WHS only support MBR not GPT. The OS under WHS is fine with larger GPT volume, but the drive extender only does MBR. MBR has a 2TB maximum.


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 8:29 am 
Offline
Top Contributor
Top Contributor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 5:33 pm
Posts: 902
Location: Florida
Thanks: 53
Thanked: 35 times in 35 posts
Thanks everyone for your input. I just recently began to seriously consider a DIY WHS. As others have noticed, there are some things I would like to do with my WHS that would be possible/easier to accomplish with a DIY. I really like my MSS and it will probably meet my needs for several more months. Anyway, now that it is running so well with my eSATA drive enclosure tower attached and it can easily grow as my media files grow with the addition of more/larger drives, I don't want to touch it for a while :D

However, I get excited about what neat new things I could do with a DIY. 8)

_________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
Aristotle - Greek critic, philosopher, physicist, & zoologist (384 BC - 322 BC)


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
PostPosted: Sun May 24, 2009 1:05 pm 
Offline
Newbie
Newbie
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 3
Location: Tifton, GA
Thanks: 1
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Howdy, everyone. I'm a new member to the board. I built my custom server around the first of April. Below is my parts list (everything from newegg). The total was a little over $800.

1 G.SKILL 4GB (2 x 2GB) 240-Pin DDR2 SDRAM DDR2 800 (PC2 6400) Dual Channel Kit Desktop Memory Model F2-6400CL5D-4GBPQ - Retail
Item #: N82E16820231122
$39.99

1 LITE-ON 22X DVD Burner Black SATA Model iHAS322-08 - Retail
Item #: N82E16827106286
$25.49

1 Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 ST3250410AS 250GB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive - OEM
Item #: N82E16822148262
$54.99

4 HITACHI 0A38016 1TB 7200 RPM SATA 3.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive - OEM
Item #: N82E16822145233
$351.96
($87.99 ea)

1 Intel Pentium E5200 Wolfdale 2.5GHz LGA 775 65W Dual-Core Processor Model BX80571E5200 - Retail
Item #: N82E16819116072
$69.99

1 CORSAIR CMPSU-650TX 650W ATX12V / EPS12V SLI Ready CrossFire Ready 80 PLUS Certified Active PFC Compatible with Core i7 ... - Retail
Item #: N82E16817139005
$89.99

1 GIGABYTE GA-EP45-UD3R LGA 775 Intel P45 ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail
Item #: N82E16813128359
$114.99

1 COOLER MASTER RC-690-KKN1-GP Black SECC/ ABS ATX Mid Tower Computer Case - Retail
Item #: N82E16811119137
$79.99

I have pictures of my setup on my blog site. The link to the article is here: http://donovanadkisson.com/2009/04/02/m ... ge-server/

I plan to add additional storage in the future. I come from a RAID 5 world (I run an ISP/Data Center) so I was a bit concerned about the way WHS handled redundancy. So far I've been happy with the setup. My home network is a mixture of Macs (iMac, Macbook Pro) and Windows machines (XP/Vista/7 RC) plus some linux servers.

Also, this board is great and there is a wealth of information here! I found it via Google when I was searching for Time Machine and WHS configurations.

_________________
Manager, Plant TiftNet
http://www.donovanadkisson.com, http://www.tiftontalks.com


Top
 Profile  
Thanks  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group