<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Windows Home Server is now backing up your temp directories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/11/25/windows-home-server-is-now-backing-up-your-temp-directories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/11/25/windows-home-server-is-now-backing-up-your-temp-directories/</link>
	<description>The Windows Home Server Enthusiast Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 09:00:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/11/25/windows-home-server-is-now-backing-up-your-temp-directories/comment-page-1/#comment-4759</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediasmartserver.net/?p=2726#comment-4759</guid>
		<description>I would like to be ABLE to back up my temp folders.  After a restore, I was unable to uninstall some stupid applications that left their installer/uninstaller in the temp directory.

However, the headline for this blog post is misleading: it is NOT now backing up my temp directories.  It is only backing up directories that aren&#039;t user or system temp, that happen to be named &quot;temp&quot;.  I&#039;m disappointed, as this was an issue after a restore several months ago.  I managed to get past it, but why, WHY, *WHY* make it a not-user-configurable option?  Acronis backs up the entire machine so it can safely be flattened and reimaged.  Why isn&#039;t my Home Server doing the same?  Very bad design decision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to be ABLE to back up my temp folders.  After a restore, I was unable to uninstall some stupid applications that left their installer/uninstaller in the temp directory.</p>
<p>However, the headline for this blog post is misleading: it is NOT now backing up my temp directories.  It is only backing up directories that aren&#8217;t user or system temp, that happen to be named &#8220;temp&#8221;.  I&#8217;m disappointed, as this was an issue after a restore several months ago.  I managed to get past it, but why, WHY, *WHY* make it a not-user-configurable option?  Acronis backs up the entire machine so it can safely be flattened and reimaged.  Why isn&#8217;t my Home Server doing the same?  Very bad design decision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: element</title>
		<link>http://www.mediasmartserver.net/2009/11/25/windows-home-server-is-now-backing-up-your-temp-directories/comment-page-1/#comment-4115</link>
		<dc:creator>element</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 12:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediasmartserver.net/?p=2726#comment-4115</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s about time.
I performed the same test as you by creating a user named &quot;Temp&quot; to prove this bug a few months back. I&#039;ve been warning anyone I know with a Windows Home Server (whether it be an HP or home-built) to avoid making folders named &quot;temp&quot; at all costs.

I believe this to be one of the best things offered by PP3.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time.<br />
I performed the same test as you by creating a user named &#8220;Temp&#8221; to prove this bug a few months back. I&#8217;ve been warning anyone I know with a Windows Home Server (whether it be an HP or home-built) to avoid making folders named &#8220;temp&#8221; at all costs.</p>
<p>I believe this to be one of the best things offered by PP3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
